[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter? |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Apr 2006 08:36:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Herbert Euler" <address@hidden> writes:
>>From: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
>>Subject: Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?
>>Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 21:41:59 -0400
>>
>> Oh, no response.
>>
>>Don't be so quick to say "no response"!
>>I responded yesterday.
>>
>>You have to give TIME for people to respond.
>
> Opps, I'm sorry. But the mailing list is too slow, since I read the
> first reply 3 days after my first post. And I'm not used to this.
The mailing list is not a single person, and you better get used to
it. You can't expect everybody with an opinion on a question to read
the list hourly for your sake.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/17
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Herbert Euler, 2006/04/17
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Miles Bader, 2006/04/17
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/04/18
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/18
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Miles Bader, 2006/04/18