[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?
From: |
Herbert Euler |
Subject: |
RE: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter? |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Apr 2006 10:40:16 +0800 |
Oh, no response. Perhaps all deverlopers are too busy to
take a look at this. Could somebody fix the following bug,
then?
- Elisp manual says "The default value is 600" in
lispref/variables.texi. It is not true for Emacs in the
CVS repository, in which the default value is 1000.
And I think it would be better if this information appears
not only in elisp manual, but also in docstring of 'max-specpdl
-size'.
Finally, a question on 'max-specpdl-size': the increment of
it cannot be avoided, can it?
Thanks.
Regards,
Guanpeng Xu
_________________________________________________________________
Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
- Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Herbert Euler, 2006/04/15
- RE: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Herbert Euler, 2006/04/16
- RE: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?,
Herbert Euler <=
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Romain Francoise, 2006/04/17
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/17
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Herbert Euler, 2006/04/17
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, David Kastrup, 2006/04/18
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Herbert Euler, 2006/04/18
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/04/18
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/18
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Herbert Euler, 2006/04/18
Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/17