[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Parital scrolling of image
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: Parital scrolling of image |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 14:59:33 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> This looks much better. But here are some remarks:
>
> a) an "open preview" that starts on a line of its own in preview-latex
> has an overlay starting at the beginning of the line. This overlay
> has a before-string consisting of an image (display-property on a
> single x character IIRC) followed by \n (so that the image will appear
> on a line of its own). Note that the image as well as the \n are not
> connected to a character in the buffer, but appear just as
> before-string. Nevertheless, previous-line in the first _real_ line
> of the overlay will be sufficiently confused as to not move at all.
> Never. This effect is probably not related to the very latest
> changes, though. I just noticed it when playing with the new code.
> It leads to pretty unintuitive results, though.
I tried various things with your circ.tex, but I cannot reproduce this
with my latest fixes. Please test again -- and if you can still
reproduce it, pls. tell me how (and what is unintuitive about the
results you see).
>
> b) Making a window as small as possible (2 lines or so) means that
> scroll-down and scroll-up, that are supposed to scroll by a "near full
> screen", namely `next-screen-context-lines' less than a full screen,
> scroll, if at all, in the opposite direction than expected. In case
> that the `next-screen-context-lines' less than a full screen delivers
> a negative or zero value, 1 should rather be substituted.
I fixed this for pixel-based scrolling.
I have also fixed a redisplay loop where resizing the frame that
displays your circ.tex with graphics loops trying to make the cursor
line fully visible.
>
> This should be a general paradigm: all window-based movement/scrolling
> commands should make _some_ progress, and in the _expected_ direction.
True.
>
> c) when pressing next-line, an image will get scrolled in smaller
> chunks (by the way, maybe one should be able to configure the size of
> those chunks). That is nice. previous-line shows no such behavior,
> however: it scrolls an image with one big jump. A bit of symmetry
> here would probably be nice to have.
Inside the image, previous-line does scroll backwards.
It is true that if you use previous-line to move into a tall image
you get to the first part of that image rather than the last part
as you would expect. I will see what I can do about it.
>
> That being said, the behavior we now have for next-line is much much
> better than what was available at any previous time.
I think so too.
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Parital scrolling of image, Kim F. Storm, 2005/01/20
- Re: Parital scrolling of image, David Kastrup, 2005/01/20
- Re: Parital scrolling of image, Richard Stallman, 2005/01/21
- Re: Parital scrolling of image, Kim F. Storm, 2005/01/21
- Re: Parital scrolling of image, David Kastrup, 2005/01/22
- Re: Parital scrolling of image, Kim F. Storm, 2005/01/22
- Re: Parital scrolling of image, David Kastrup, 2005/01/23
- Re: Parital scrolling of image,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: Parital scrolling of image, Ralf Angeli, 2005/01/24
- Re: Parital scrolling of image, Ralf Angeli, 2005/01/24
- Re: Parital scrolling of image, Kim F. Storm, 2005/01/24
- Re: Parital scrolling of image, Ralf Angeli, 2005/01/24
- Re: Parital scrolling of image, David Kastrup, 2005/01/24
- Re: Parital scrolling of image, David Kastrup, 2005/01/23
- Re: Parital scrolling of image, David Kastrup, 2005/01/23
- Re: Parital scrolling of image, Kim F. Storm, 2005/01/24