[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Parital scrolling of image
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Parital scrolling of image |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 22:42:24 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Cough, cough. If I have a window with the upper half taken up by
>> an image, and point is in some normal text below the image, then
>> pressing C-n will _not_ move to the next line (which is perfectly
>> on screen and quite far from the edge),
>
> I have checked in some patches to fix this. Please try again.
Another note: when I execute scroll-down at the following screen shot
(where point is just at the bottom) I get "beginning of buffer"
signalled as an error and nothing changes (I have made sure that this
behavior will also occur when pre-command-hook and post-command-hook
are not modified by preview-latex, so they are not at fault here). As
you can see from the scroll bar, this is patently absurd: there are at
least four more screens of material worth, and although there are
quite a few images in there, there are a lot of positions in between
where point could stop if needed. This is the standard "circ.tex"
file as delivered with the preview-latex package. I don't consider
including the screen shot a shootable offense, since it is just 12kB.
Probably the pixel-based movement routines should more or less
calculate a maximum they should not exceed in movement (overshooting
by more than a screen certainly is bad), as well as a minimum they
should at least progress, and if "sane" movement does not land within
that area, then vscroll gets adjusted instead.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: Parital scrolling of image, (continued)
- Re: Parital scrolling of image, Kim F. Storm, 2005/01/21
- Re: Parital scrolling of image, David Kastrup, 2005/01/22
- Re: Parital scrolling of image, Kim F. Storm, 2005/01/22
- Re: Parital scrolling of image, David Kastrup, 2005/01/23
- Re: Parital scrolling of image, Kim F. Storm, 2005/01/24
- Re: Parital scrolling of image, Ralf Angeli, 2005/01/24
- Re: Parital scrolling of image, Ralf Angeli, 2005/01/24
- Re: Parital scrolling of image, Kim F. Storm, 2005/01/24
- Re: Parital scrolling of image, Ralf Angeli, 2005/01/24
- Re: Parital scrolling of image, David Kastrup, 2005/01/24
- Re: Parital scrolling of image,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Parital scrolling of image, David Kastrup, 2005/01/23
- Re: Parital scrolling of image, Kim F. Storm, 2005/01/24