[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gnus branch
From: |
Reiner Steib |
Subject: |
Re: Gnus branch |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:48:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Sat, Aug 14 2004, Richard Stallman wrote:
> The idea was not to lose changes that occured in the trunk, right?
>
> Yes. The useful changes in the trunk were going to be merged into the
> branch.
>
> When that is done, we want to move the new Gnus into trunk. Is it
> done?
I have installed your change (mark `mailcap-mime-data' as risky) in
the branch and in the Gnus repository (trunk and v5_10 branch).
Some other (maybe) important changes (by Stefan Monnier, Juanma
Barranquero, Kim F. Storm, Sam Steingold, ...) have not been installed
yet. (When this is done, I'll import those changes back to the Gnus
repository, too.)
I'm not sure how to handle the ChangeLog entries from Emacs/trunk:
lisp/gnus/ChangeLog has entries from 2004-06-29 back to 1998-08-29.
Most of those are no longer relevant after the import of Gnus v5_10
branch. Even worse, after installing the ChangeLog entries from Gnus
v5_10 branch (which has to be done), we would have non-monotonic
entries. Is it okay to move the Emacs/trunk entries to
lisp/gnus/ChangeLog.2 (or should they be removed)? In
lisp/gnus/ChangeLog, we'd only have the entries belonging to Oort
Gnus aka Gnus 5.10.
Bye, Reiner.
--
,,,
(o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- PGP key available via WWW http://rsteib.home.pages.de/
- Gnus branch, Stefan Monnier, 2004/08/12
- Re: Gnus branch, David Kastrup, 2004/08/12
- Re: Gnus branch, Richard Stallman, 2004/08/13
- Re: Gnus branch, Reiner Steib, 2004/08/22
- Re: Gnus branch, Reiner Steib, 2004/08/22
- Re: Gnus branch, Reiner Steib, 2004/08/30
- Re: Gnus branch, Katsumi Yamaoka, 2004/08/30
- Re: Gnus branch, Katsumi Yamaoka, 2004/08/31
- Re: Gnus branch, Richard Stallman, 2004/08/31
- Re: Gnus branch, Miles Bader, 2004/08/31