Re: Gnus branch

[David Kastrup]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

> I find the separate branch for Gnus to be inconvenient.  Since it
> seems the code already works well as it is, I think it makes more
> sense to move it to the trunk right away and to then do "merge left
> over changes" on the trunk rather than on the branch.

The idea was not to lose changes that occured in the trunk, right?  If
that more or less is given, then I say, go ahead.  I think the sooner
many testers get their hands on the new Gnus, the better.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum