[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GC crashes
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: GC crashes |
Date: |
Mon, 8 Dec 2003 16:14:03 +0900 (JST) |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.3 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <jwvbrqjomkr.fsf-monnier+emacs/address@hidden>, Stefan Monnier
<address@hidden> writes:
> Yes, we agree 100%. If you passed Qt instead of Qkey,
> then the entries are removed if either key or value does
> not survive, but since your values are integers, they'll
> always survive.
Ooops, my damn head. So, you mean that in both Qt and Qkey
cases, entries of composition hash table will be removed. I
now understand that.
I have had another mis-understanding about the Qt case. It
means key-and-value, and it means that "remove if either key
or value does not survive", not that "remove if both key and
value do not survive". I should have read the docstring
more carefully.
---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden
- Re: GC crashes, (continued)
- Re: GC crashes, Stefan Monnier, 2003/12/03
- Re: GC crashes, Kenichi Handa, 2003/12/03
- Re: GC crashes, Kenichi Handa, 2003/12/03
- Re: GC crashes, Stefan Monnier, 2003/12/04
- Re: GC crashes, Kenichi Handa, 2003/12/07
- Re: GC crashes, Stefan Monnier, 2003/12/07
- Re: GC crashes, Kenichi Handa, 2003/12/08
- Re: GC crashes, Stefan Monnier, 2003/12/08
- Re: GC crashes, Kenichi Handa, 2003/12/08
- Re: GC crashes, Stefan Monnier, 2003/12/08
- Re: GC crashes,
Kenichi Handa <=
Re: GC crashes, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/12/02