[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Changes in latin-ltx.el
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Changes in latin-ltx.el |
Date: |
Sun, 9 Dec 2001 20:02:34 -0700 (MST) |
I think it actually could be confusing the way it is now: someone who
uses a TeX-like input method will most probably type scientific text,
not Hebrew text.
That seems likely.
That someone will not expect Hebrew characters in
their text instead of mathematical symbols.
A priori I suppose he would not care which one he gets, if they look
and behave the same.
No, please don't! The TeX-like strings that latin-ltx uses are
supposed to produce mathematical symbols, isn't that true? If so,
it's simply _wrong_ to produce Hebrew letters instead, because in
Unicode, these are different characters. For example, they have
different bidirectional properties, so when bidirectional display will
be supported, the mathematical expressions, in which these characters
will be used, will be messed up by the bidi reordering algorithm!
This seems like a significant difference in behavior, and a strong
argument for reverting the change. Is there a counterargument?
- Re: Changes in latin-ltx.el, Dave Love, 2001/12/07
- Re: Changes in latin-ltx.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/12/07
- Re: Changes in latin-ltx.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/12/12
- Re: Changes in latin-ltx.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/12
- Re: Changes in latin-ltx.el, Dave Love, 2001/12/21
- Re: Changes in latin-ltx.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/12/22