[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: table.el
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: table.el |
Date: |
Sun, 9 Dec 2001 20:01:18 -0700 (MST) |
I spent sometime rethinking about this. What the current table advice
does to those original commands (functions) is to set up a special
environment (set buffer to a cell cache buffer, etc.) then to let the
original function (unmodified) do its work and finally to clean up
(filling paragraph, restore current buffer, etc.)
Is the cache buffer set up in the same way for all these functions?
What about the followup processing--is it the same for all these
functions?
If so, perhaps the right solution is with a general "cache buffer"
feature that would apply to all commands, or to some broad range of
commands. This way, the individual commands would not have hooks,
or wrappers, or advice, or anything similar. The feature would
work for all commands without knowing a list of them.
That is the kind of solution I would like to find.
- Re: table.el, (continued)
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/08
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/08
- Re: table.el, Kim F. Storm, 2001/12/08
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/10
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/11
- Re: table.el,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/09