[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Customize and autoloaded libraries
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Customize and autoloaded libraries |
Date: |
Sat, 8 Dec 2001 20:02:07 -0700 (MST) |
> Defining `defhook' and changing so many hooks to use it is a large
> change. We have better things to do with our time, and asking users
> to change their code is a burden on them. I am thoroughly against it.
The change is trivial, and declarations that isn't changed will
continue to work like before.
Each individual change is trivial, but making a change like this
in all the files is massive. So I am against it.
- Re: Customize and autoloaded libraries, (continued)
- Re: Customize and autoloaded libraries, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/05
- Re: Customize and autoloaded libraries, Per Abrahamsen, 2001/12/05
- Re: Customize and autoloaded libraries, Stefan Monnier, 2001/12/05
- Re: Customize and autoloaded libraries, Per Abrahamsen, 2001/12/05
- Re: Customize and autoloaded libraries, Stefan Monnier, 2001/12/05
- Re: Customize and autoloaded libraries, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/06
- Re: Customize and autoloaded libraries, Per Abrahamsen, 2001/12/07
- Re: Customize and autoloaded libraries,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Customize and autoloaded libraries, Stefan Monnier, 2001/12/04
- Re: Customize and autoloaded libraries, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/05