Re: [Emacs-devel] Repository Move

[Sam Steingold]

> * In message <address@hidden>
> * On the subject of "Re: [Emacs-devel] Repository Move"
> * Sent on Fri, 29 Sep 2000 11:54:27 +0100
> * Honorable Dave Love <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >>>>> "GM" == Gerd Moellmann <address@hidden> writes:
> 
>  GM> Bill Perry is receiving emacs-devel.  I think he should be able
>  GM> to tell if W3 and URL should be moved to subversions.
> 
> Could it be set up so that people can hack on it?  I have a pile of
> changes, though I've never made it work properly in Emacs 21 (despite
> promising to get it integrated).

I could and did commit patches to w3 and url before the move.

-- 
Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds)
Micros**t is not the answer.  Micros**t is a question, and the answer is Linux,
(http://www.linux.org) the choice of the GNU (http://www.gnu.org) generation.
If it has syntax, it isn't user friendly.