[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU][Proposal] Naming convention for Bug reports
From: |
Stephen Compall |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU][Proposal] Naming convention for Bug reports |
Date: |
31 Jul 2003 01:50:43 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
James Michael DuPont <address@hidden> writes:
> I have a humble suggestion for the naming of bugreports,
> patches and such :
>
> [Module-Name]/[Context] Description
>
> for example :
> [Pnet/Ildasm][Attributes] Problem with $74|\|63 Names
> ...
> What do you think?
Hmm. I think there could be some trouble getting people to actually
do this. Of course, this could be solved with arbitrary renaming, but
pipermail doesn't make that a user feature, I'm sure.
Dream this. Bug-reporting webservice. Of course, then you'd start
getting reports of the form:
[dgreportbug][Calling] 0.1.2 doesn't accept new bug reports
--
Stephen Compall or s11 or sirian
"Yo, Mike!"
"Yeah, Gabe?"
"We got a problem down on Earth. In Utah."
"I thought you fixed that last century!"
"No, no, not that. Someone's found a security problem in the physics
program. They're getting energy out of nowhere."
"Blessit! Lemme look... <tappity clickity tappity> Hey, it's
there all right! OK, just a sec... <tappity clickity tap... save... compile>
There, that ought to patch it. Dist it out, wouldja?"
-- Cold Fusion, 1989
ICE M-14 bemd cracking fissionable Merlin keyhole David John Oates
CDMA Perl-RSA SHA quiche jihad offensive information warfare PLO