[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Who-is-who"?...Who is "Who-is-who"? (was Re: [DotGNU]Project inform
|
From: |
S11001001 |
|
Subject: |
Re: "Who-is-who"?...Who is "Who-is-who"? (was Re: [DotGNU]Project information) |
|
Date: |
Tue, 11 Jun 2002 22:23:05 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1a) Gecko/20020608 |
S11001001 wrote:
It really depends. Exactly who belongs in the WIW? i.e., I wouldn't
presume that I'm important enough to be in the WIW, and I think that
some here might share that feeling. Certainly in some cases it's obvious
though.
I mean about themselves, not me ;)
--
Stephen Compall
DotGNU `Contributor' -- http://www.dotgnu.org
My views about copyright take an hour to expound, but one general
principle applies: it cannot justify denying the public important
freedoms. As Abraham Lincoln put it, "Whenever there is a conflict
between human rights and property rights, human rights must prevail."
Property rights are meant to advance human well-being, not as an
excuse to disregard it.
-- RMS, "The GNU GPL and the American Way"