[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: `freeing' proprietary software (was Re: [DotGNU]Open ContentNetwork
From: |
Barry Fitzgerald |
Subject: |
Re: `freeing' proprietary software (was Re: [DotGNU]Open ContentNetwork: Free Software P2P) |
Date: |
Sun, 02 Jun 2002 13:22:21 -0400 |
Angel \"Java\" Lopez wrote:
>
> Hmmm....... food particles can be shared, but not copied without effort....
> This is an important difference in bits and bytes....
>
Yes, which ultimately means that there should be fewer restrictions on
copying bits and bytes because their natural inclination and function is
to be explicitely copied in the first place.
That's an important physical difference, but I was referring to
conceptual difference -- of which there is none. What you have
described, conceptually, is a loophole - not core conceptual difference
in sharing.
But, yes - it does affect it. Just not in the way that most people
think about it.
-Barry
- Re: `freeing' proprietary software (was Re: [DotGNU]Open ContentNetwork: Free Software P2P), Barry Fitzgerald, 2002/06/02
- Re: `freeing' proprietary software (was Re: [DotGNU]Open ContentNetwork: Free Software P2P), Angel \"Java\" Lopez, 2002/06/02
- Re: `freeing' proprietary software (was Re: [DotGNU]Open ContentNetwork: Free Software P2P),
Barry Fitzgerald <=
- Re: `freeing' proprietary software (was Re: [DotGNU]Open ContentNetwork: Free Software P2P), Angel \"Java\" Lopez, 2002/06/02
- [DotGNU]paying for free software (was Re: `freeing' proprietary software), S11001001, 2002/06/02
- Re: [DotGNU]paying for free software (was Re: `freeing' proprietary software), Norbert Bollow, 2002/06/05
- Re: [DotGNU]paying for free software (was Re: `freeing' proprietary software), Barry Fitzgerald, 2002/06/09
- Re: [DotGNU]paying for free software (was Re: `freeing' proprietary software), Angel \"Java\" Lopez, 2002/06/09
- Re: [DotGNU]paying for free software (was Re: `freeing' proprietary software), Barry Fitzgerald, 2002/06/09
- Re: [DotGNU]paying for free software (was Re: `freeing' proprietary software), Angel \"Java\" Lopez, 2002/06/09
- Re: [DotGNU]paying for free software (was Re: `freeing' proprietary software), Barry Fitzgerald, 2002/06/09
- [DotGNU]software should not have owners (was Re: paying for free software (was Re: `freeing' proprietary software)), S11001001, 2002/06/11
- free "software" & geeky nitpicking (was Re: [DotGNU]paying for free software (was Re: `freeing' proprietary software)), S11001001, 2002/06/11