[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep and valgrind
From: |
Richard Frith-Macdonald |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep and valgrind |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Mar 2018 18:11:06 +0000 |
> On 16 Mar 2018, at 17:58, Fred Kiefer <fredkiefer@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> I think that now I see the flaw in my argument. I was under the impression
> that an autorelease pool will only release contained objects if they have a
> reference count of one. But that is nonsense. The autorelease pool will
> release all contained objects and as usual the ones where the reference count
> drops to zero will be deallocated. The autorelease pool itself doesn’t care
> about the reference count. That way your example was correct, with the
> autorelease pool around the object creation they will only be retained by the
> array and go away when that is deallocated.
Exactly.
- Re: GNUstep and valgrind, (continued)
- Re: GNUstep and valgrind, amon, 2018/03/16
- Re: GNUstep and valgrind, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2018/03/16
- Re: GNUstep and valgrind, Fred Kiefer, 2018/03/16
- Re: GNUstep and valgrind, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2018/03/16
- Re: GNUstep and valgrind, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2018/03/16
- Re: GNUstep and valgrind, Fred Kiefer, 2018/03/16
- Re: GNUstep and valgrind, Fred Kiefer, 2018/03/16
- Re: GNUstep and valgrind,
Richard Frith-Macdonald <=
- Re: GNUstep and valgrind, amon, 2018/03/16
- Re: GNUstep and valgrind, amon, 2018/03/17
- Re: GNUstep and valgrind, Ivan Vučica, 2018/03/17
- Re: GNUstep and valgrind, amon, 2018/03/17
- Re: GNUstep and valgrind, Fred Kiefer, 2018/03/18
- Re: GNUstep and valgrind, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2018/03/18
- Re: GNUstep and valgrind, amon, 2018/03/19
- Re: GNUstep and valgrind, Fred Kiefer, 2018/03/19
- Re: GNUstep and valgrind, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2018/03/19
- Re: GNUstep and valgrind, amon, 2018/03/20