discuss-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Discuss-gnustep Digest, Vol 36, Issue 37


From: Rogelio M. Serrano Jr.
Subject: Re: Discuss-gnustep Digest, Vol 36, Issue 37
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 22:41:29 +0800

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2005-11-26 21:25:16 +0800 Michael Thaler
<michael.thaler@physik.tu-muenchen.de> wrote:


And nextstep/openstep is dead for a long time. Without Steve Jobs noone would care for nextstp/openstep at all anymore. Steve Jobs did the right thing. He turned nextstep into something the average Joe user can and wants to use. Steve Jobs allways managed to make things that excite people. But gnustep is not exciting for the average Joe user. It is an excellent development framework based on an excellent language, but there are absolutely no applications which make it worth using gnustep, it looks ugly compared to MacOSX, KDE or GNOME (this is of course personal preference but I am quite sure if you ask 100 average computer users which look they like most, gnustep will be the loser by a wide margin), it interoperates badly with every other free desktop environement (which is bad because there are essential apps like a browser missing in gnustep) and it is hard to install.


Not really. Mac OS X is openstep. Its very much alive. In fact I
started to get interested in GNUstep when i dug a little bit into Mac
OS X documentation. It showed that the design is sound and
commercially viable.

The core developers of GNUstep want a portable cross platform
development environment. They just dont care if its popular or not.
They have something they can use and if the rest of the world thinks
otherwise then, well, so what?

GNUstep is not going to go away. Im using an almost all GNUstep
laptop. I built it by hand from sources but of course its not
complete. Its running on debian and the browser is firefox. Its not
wise to start hyping gnustep before we have something like a nextstep
reincarnation.

Thats just my opinion anyway.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using the GPG bundle for GNUMail

iD8DBQFDiHQZyihxuQOYt8wRApgYAKC4pD3GkPxItKcMquOaDGfpudCYQwCfcYYu
zTUjJ3N52ldtkWNvjzSlebw=
=8HtH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]