Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration

[Helge Hess]

On 19. Okt 2005, at 02:36 Uhr, Andrew Ruder wrote:
> Should the sourceware.org folks respond favorably to our hosting of
> gnustep subversion there, will it be pursued?

I suppose GNUstep should stick with GNU focused services and  
definitely not move to a specific vendor (RedHat in this case).  
Reasons got stated by Adam and I tend to agree.


Given the feedback of Richard, Wim, Rogelio the proposal seems to be  
dropped. The "6 months" timeout mentioned by some seems to be a  
rather ridiculous "excuse" to me since in this timeframe the systems  
_definitely_ won't change in any noticable way.
Apparently the core developers are fine with CVS - which is rather  
surprising to me, but needs to be accepted.

The primary thing I would have hoped for are branches which might not  
directly reflect the "regligious GNUstep path", eg branches which  
support FHS. IMHO this would have been much easier with Svn and  
definitely won't happen as CVS branches.

Greets,
  Helge
--
http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/helge/
OpenGroupware.org