[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration
From: |
Andrew Ruder |
Subject: |
Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Oct 2005 19:36:23 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 09:56:30PM -0500, Andrew Ruder wrote:
> I am proposing that GNUstep migrate to using subversion (instead of
> CVS). Gna.org (FSF France) has subversion hosting, and I believe Alex
> Perez has already registered a GNUstep project there.
Ok, the current summary:
* Mixed reactions (as if it wouldn't be). There are several people
behind the move and several who oppose it.
* Waiting on sourceware.org to reply, I am told they are still
considering it. I am told they would much more rather us have fully
moved over there, but in order to not raise even more of an argument
I decided it best not to tack more onto what it would take to move.
Hosting just subversion is as of yet still a possibility, I have not
heard anything to say otherwise.
* Gna.org's hosting service has been nixed more or less by most. I
don't think that this is worth pursuing because of the overall
negative response.
My question:
Should the sourceware.org folks respond favorably to our hosting of
gnustep subversion there, will it be pursued? I have seen lots of
arguments going both ways, but have not noticed anything from the core
developers stating whether this thread of action will even be
considered. In short, should I just inform the sourceware.org people
not to worry about it and just wait for savannah to offer some
alternative? Or should I begin some proposals of layout for the new
repository and start figuring out the details with the hope that hosting
issue solves itself?
I'm not looking for a flamefest here, just a simple yes or no from a
core developer with some clout in the GNUstep project, or at least some
suggestions of things that would be required besides figuring out the
hosting issue.
Thanks,
Andy
--
Andrew Ruder
http://www.aeruder.net
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, (continued)
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, David Ayers, 2005/10/11
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, Adrian Robert, 2005/10/11
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, riccardo_mottola, 2005/10/11
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, Maurizio Boriani, 2005/10/11
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration,
Andrew Ruder <=
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, Adam Fedor, 2005/10/18
- Re: Proposal: Subversion Migration, MJ Ray, 2005/10/11