[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Introduction, and Proposed GSFH.
From: |
Mirko Viviani |
Subject: |
Re: Introduction, and Proposed GSFH. |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Mar 2002 22:38:49 +0100 |
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Nicola Pero wrote:
> When you port a framework from MacOSX, you can compile it as a shared
> library on GNUstep.
Ok, do it and tell me how much time do you need. Then do with framework
stuff and make a comparison.
> Said that, if you want to use a GNUstep framework, use it. We have them.
> They have the same name as MacOSX frameworks, they install stuff in the
> same directory structure, and they also provide the NSBundle difficult API
> bits. You are free to use them if you want. Of course they work on
> GNU/linux, but who knows on other platforms.
Sorry, but your last statement makes no sense !
All the things are not portable on all system, as you said... so since my NS 3.3
box can't compile a shared library I have to force all systems to use static
library ?
As I said many times, framework stuff is not yet _finished_.
> I do agree with was said, or is going to be said, that we need to separate
> the gnustep-base resources, and the gnustep-gui resources, and every
> library resources, from the resources of other libraries, and we need to
> do that cleanly. All these changes take time.
Indeed... did you consider resources versioning ?
---
Bye,
Mirko <mirko.viviani@rccr.cremona.it> (NeXTmail, MIME)
<mirko@yourbox.net>
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: Introduction, and Proposed GSFH.,
Mirko Viviani <=