[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: switch to XHTML
From: |
Jeff Teunissen |
Subject: |
Re: switch to XHTML |
Date: |
Tue, 05 Mar 2002 22:11:59 -0500 |
Gregory Martin Pfeil wrote:
>
> On Thursday, March 2, 102, at 10:57 AM, Gerold Rupprecht wrote:
>
> > Thank you but no thank you.
> >
> > I am still using NeXTSTEP OmniWeb browser version 2.7 beta 3 so HTML
> > is still appreciated.
> >
> > Otherwise I would be forced to surf with my PC.
>
> I think you misunderstand. If your browser can parse HTML, it can parse
> XHTML. XHTML doesn't break anything -- just adds some restrictions.
Except for the fact that many browsers can't read it, which makes it no
different from Netscape 2.0's HTML extensions. No thanks.
> eg:
> In HTML, you can use upper, lower, or mixed-case tags and
> attributes
> In XHTML tags and attributes must be lower-case
This is one of the dumber things to have taken place under the aegis of the
W3C, and one of the reasons HTML won't be going away any time soon.
W3C isn't supposed to be in the business of creating policy, or legislating
style.
--
| Jeff Teunissen -=- Pres., Dusk To Dawn Computing -=- deek @ d2dc.net
| GPG: 1024D/9840105A 7102 808A 7733 C2F3 097B 161B 9222 DAB8 9840 105A
| Core developer, The QuakeForge Project http://www.quakeforge.net/
| Specializing in Debian GNU/Linux http://www.d2dc.net/~deek/
- Re: switch to XHTML, Gregory Martin Pfeil, 2002/03/02
- Re: switch to XHTML,
Jeff Teunissen <=
- Re: switch to XHTML, Gregory Martin Pfeil, 2002/03/08
- Re: switch to XHTML, Pete French, 2002/03/08
- Re: switch to XHTML, Jeff Teunissen, 2002/03/08
- Re: switch to XHTML, Robert J. Slover, 2002/03/08
- Re: switch to XHTML, Pete French, 2002/03/08
- Re: switch to XHTML, Pascal Bourguignon, 2002/03/08
- Re: switch to XHTML, Jeff Teunissen, 2002/03/08
- Re: switch to XHTML, Jeff Teunissen, 2002/03/08
- Re: switch to XHTML, Pete French, 2002/03/09
- Re: switch to XHTML, Jeff Teunissen, 2002/03/11