[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Binary packaging problems on x86_64
From: |
Larry Doolittle |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Binary packaging problems on x86_64 |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:48:40 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
Eric -
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 11:29:13AM -0800, Eric Blossom wrote:
>
> Seems like putting the native stuff where it's always been
> (${libdir}) would have been an obvious win.
For suitable definition of "native", yes. I guess the
"problem" that SuSE et al. address with their corruption
of this idea is to let commercial 32-bit binaries (that
reference 32-bit plug-ins in /lib) continue to run unchanged
on x86_64 computers.
> Perhaps it will return to this.
In the proper (Debian) environment, it already has. ;-)
> Is this summary correct?
>
> X86_64 64-bit 32-bit
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> SuSE 9.3 ${prefix}/lib64 ${prefix}/lib
> Mandriva 2006 ${prefix}/lib64 ${prefix}/lib
> Gentoo ${prefix}/lib64 ${prefix}/lib
> Debian Sarge ${prefix}/lib <someplace else>
> Debian Sid ${prefix}/lib <someplace else>
> NetBSD ${prefix}/lib <someplace else>
>
> I know that ${prefix}/lib* should really be ${libdir}, but I want to
> be clear about the lib vs lib64 part.
The <someplace else> seems to be /emul/ia32-linux/lib on Debian.
I'm not sure, the only 32-bit clutter my Sid x86_64 machine has
picked up is in /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib. I already filed bug
reports complaining about it.
- Larry
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GNU Radio 2.6 release!, (continued)
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GNU Radio 2.6 release!, Berndt Josef Wulf, 2005/12/16
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] doxygen et al, Eric Blossom, 2005/12/16
- [Discuss-gnuradio] Binary packaging problems on x86_64, Berndt Josef Wulf, 2005/12/18
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Binary packaging problems on x86_64, Eric Blossom, 2005/12/18
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Binary packaging problems on x86_64, Larry Doolittle, 2005/12/18
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Binary packaging problems on x86_64, Larry Doolittle, 2005/12/18
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Binary packaging problems on x86_64, Greg Troxel, 2005/12/19
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Binary packaging problems on x86_64, Larry Doolittle, 2005/12/19
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Binary packaging problems on x86_64, Greg Troxel, 2005/12/19
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Binary packaging problems on x86_64, Eric Blossom, 2005/12/19
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Binary packaging problems on x86_64,
Larry Doolittle <=
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Binary packaging problems on x86_64, Dave Dodge, 2005/12/19
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GNU Radio 2.6 release!, Berndt Josef Wulf, 2005/12/16
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GNU Radio 2.6 release!, Berndt Josef Wulf, 2005/12/17
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] doxygen, Eric Blossom, 2005/12/17
- [Discuss-gnuradio] make check problems ... resolved, Bill Tracey, 2005/12/17
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] GNU Radio 2.6 release!, Eric Blossom, 2005/12/12
[Discuss-gnuradio] savannah cvs restructured; checkout neeeds updating, Greg Troxel, 2005/12/12
[Discuss-gnuradio] Regenerating FPGA bit file (USRP-0.9), Angilberto Muniz Sb, 2005/12/12