denemo-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Denemo-devel] [bug #46868] Missing .DLL files in downloads


From: Richard Shann
Subject: Re: [Denemo-devel] [bug #46868] Missing .DLL files in downloads
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 08:45:12 +0000

On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 00:35 -0600, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> Do you want me to compile LilyPond? We may be able to debug what is
> going on. If we copy the LilyPond directory, we would add about 50mb
> to the zip file. If we know what essential files that would need
> copying over we could go that route also. I could not get it to
> execute denemo in wine for some reason. I will have to try it again.
> What do you suggest?
I wonder if the build machine should be running lilydev (as this would
leverage the effort the LilyPond folk put in to maintain an environment
that builds LilyPond). I didn't realize you weren't building LilyPond -
how is the current zip file created?

Richard

> 
> Jeremiah
> 
> On Jan 11, 2016 1:14 PM, "Richard Shann" <address@hidden>
> wrote:
>         I see that libgcc_... is now present in /usr/bin on the 11 Jan
>         build and
>         (as always) it executes on the 32-bit Vista box I have access
>         to. No
>         progress with LilyPond though - do you have an idea about how
>         to fix
>         this?
>         
>         Richard
>         
>         
>         
>         On Sun, 2016-01-10 at 12:05 -0600, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
>         > I will look into compiling it statically. I saw that it was
>         compiled
>         > and installed but it was not packaged up when creating the
>         mingw
>         > binary. I wrote a few lines in the routine for creating the
>         mingw
>         > package to copy the two files into the temp file it creates
>         before
>         > zipping it all up.  It is building now.
>         >
>         >
>         > It could have also been caused by my removing the lilypond
>         depenedency
>         > for gub. This way it does not build the lilypond that was
>         crashing
>         > anyway. Do you still want to copy the entire lilypond folder
>         over?
>         >
>         >
>         > Jeremiah
>         >
>         >
>         > On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Richard Shann
>         > <address@hidden> wrote:
>         >         Follow-up Comment #1, bug #46868 (project denemo):
>         >
>         >         I've looked in the 28th Jan zip file and the
>         gcc_s... dll
>         >         library is present
>         >         in the bin directory.
>         >         Both this and the later zip versions all run fine on
>         a 32-bit
>         >         Windows Vista
>         >         machine, so I'm not sure why some machines need it
>         and some
>         >         don't. I found a
>         >         link to this subject
>         >
>          
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12921911/mingw-libgcc-s-sjlj-1-dll-is-missing
>         >         which seems to indicate two possibilities - either a
>         flag
>         >         needed at link time
>         >         or a switch from 64 bit to 32 bit mingw compiler.
>         >         Here are the relevant bits:
>         >
>         >         You have to use -static-libgcc while compiling with
>         mingw’s g
>         >         ++ to elemenate
>         >         the dependacy on LIBGCC_S_SJLJ-1.DLL. You can do
>         that by
>         >         adding static-libgcc
>         >         to the linker flags.
>         >
>         >         I found this info in this post:
>         >
>          
> http://www.qtcentre.org/threads/39639-MinGW-w64-dependency-on-LIBGCC_S_SJLJ-1-DLL
>         >
>         >         thanks for the link, that wasn't my problem but i
>         saw in the
>         >         link, that this
>         >         description is for mingw 64. this pointed me in the
>         right
>         >         direction. i
>         >         compiled the program using the 32 bit mingw compiler
>         instead
>         >         of the 64 bit
>         >         compiler.
>         >
>         >
>          _______________________________________________________
>         >
>         >         Reply to this item at:
>         >
>         >           <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?46868>
>         >
>         >         _______________________________________________
>         >           Message sent via/by Savannah
>         >           http://savannah.gnu.org/
>         >
>         >
>         >         _______________________________________________
>         >         Denemo-devel mailing list
>         >         address@hidden
>         >         https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         
>         





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]