denemo-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Denemo-devel] [bug #46868] Missing .DLL files in downloads


From: Richard Shann
Subject: Re: [Denemo-devel] [bug #46868] Missing .DLL files in downloads
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 18:09:10 +0000

On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 11:45 -0600, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> 2.18.2 was the version that crashed. It was 2.19 that worked.


We've had a misunderstanding here. This is the quote from my reply to
Ellen Schwindt who was the second person to report a LilyPond crash:


8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><
> > This is the second report like this: I tried it just now and my
> version
> > of LilyPond typeset it without problem. Then I tested it on a
> Windows
> > box and, sure enough, LilyPond threw up a window (well, to be
> precise it
> > is something called the mingw runtime that throws up the window).
> >
> > The first good news is that if I choose "Ignore" it did go on to
> > generate a typeset score.
> >
> > But the proper fix is to get the stable version of LilyPond (Denemo
> for
> > windows is shipped with an experimental version, for obscure
> reasons).
> > This is not too horrendous. I just tried it out. You go to
> lilypond.org
> > and to Download Stable and choose windows version. Once downloaded
> you
> > install it taking the defaults (so it installs in C:\Program Files
> > \LilyPond) and then - this is the tricky bit - you go to
> Edit->Change
> > Preferences->Externals
> > and in the LilyPond field you change
> >
8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><8><


As it says there, I diagnosed this as a failure of the 2.19.x that we
shipped with Denemo and advised getting 2.18.2

Is there a still earlier email where lilypond crashes were being
reported for 2.18.x ? My memory and my search techniques are not good
enough to answer that.

Let's try straight LilyPond stable and work from there.



>  The problem was that you told me their was a big with this version
> and that we need to revert to stable version.

I'm a bit puzzled by that sentence - that is what I recall, a bug showed
up with the 2.19 and we needed to revert to stable.


> 
> Now do you want to keep building with 2.18 2 or should we use
> unstable. Maybe they can patch what ever bug that we find. The big may
> be even fixed by now. It was an older unstable snapshot.

let's try stable. If there's a bug that shows in 2.18.2 as delivered
from LilyPond.org, LilyPond gang will fix it otherwise we will have to
figure out what is wrong with our build.


Richard





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]