[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Denemo-devel] Command generation mechanism
From: |
Richard Shann |
Subject: |
Re: [Denemo-devel] Command generation mechanism |
Date: |
Mon, 06 May 2013 14:35:49 +0100 |
Great - I tested this as a new user, getting your branch by git clone.
Your standalone generator is working perfectly - slightly too perfectly
inasmuch as the resulting commands.c is identical including the initial
comment at the top of the file which needs now to point to the new
generate_commands.c file :)
We should aim to integrate your work as often as we can, so I suggest a
merge of your branch (to the current commit
62b71f3180a07cf91d4916588a014db13125ab46) now. Are you happy (& able) to
do this?
Richard
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 11:42 +0200, Éloi Rivard wrote:
> This is pushed on eloi branch.
> Yep I use color-gcc for debugging but I forgot to reset gcc instead,
> this is fixed.
>
>
>
> 2013/5/6 Richard Shann <address@hidden>
> On Sun, 2013-05-05 at 20:42 +0200, Éloi Rivard wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > See attached patch. utils/generate_commands creates the very
> same code
> > than launching denemo with -DGENERATE_SOURCE_CODE
> > I indented some code in keyboard.c so some line have been
> changed but
> > the behavior is the same. I also fixed some unused variable
> warnings.
>
>
> This looks excellent - good work! I don't want to be acting as
> a brake
> on your development - I will get stressed out if I think
> someone is
> waiting for me to do something. So I think it will be good if
> you bring
> the branch eloi that Jeremiah created for you in git
> up-to-date using
> git merge (or whatever it is called) and commit your changes
> there (I am
> presuming Jeremiah has given you write permission).
> I have a separate user account which I can use to build from
> that branch
> in a clean environment and test there.
> This would be making proper use of git, rather than the
> old-fashioned
> patch methods...
>
> One thing I noticed in your code is something called
> color-gcc, which I
> guess is some colorized version of gcc? - I don't have that,
> and we
> wouldn't want to introduce more dependencies without a good
> reason...
> But that is the sort of wrinkle easily sorted out once the
> code is in
> git.
>
> Richard
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Éloi Rivard - address@hidden
>
> « On perd plus à être indécis qu'à se tromper. »
>
- [Denemo-devel] Command generation mechanism, Éloi Rivard, 2013/05/04
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Command generation mechanism, Richard Shann, 2013/05/05
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Command generation mechanism, Éloi Rivard, 2013/05/05
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Command generation mechanism, Éloi Rivard, 2013/05/05
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Command generation mechanism, Richard Shann, 2013/05/05
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Command generation mechanism, Éloi Rivard, 2013/05/05
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Command generation mechanism, Richard Shann, 2013/05/05
- Message not available
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Command generation mechanism, Richard Shann, 2013/05/06
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Command generation mechanism, Éloi Rivard, 2013/05/06
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Command generation mechanism,
Richard Shann <=
- Message not available
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Command generation mechanism, Richard Shann, 2013/05/06
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Command generation mechanism, Richard Shann, 2013/05/06
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Command generation mechanism, Éloi Rivard, 2013/05/06
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Command generation mechanism, Éloi Rivard, 2013/05/06
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Command generation mechanism, Éloi Rivard, 2013/05/17
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Command generation mechanism, Richard Shann, 2013/05/17
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Command generation mechanism, Éloi Rivard, 2013/05/19
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Command generation mechanism, Richard Shann, 2013/05/20
- Message not available
- Message not available
- [Denemo-devel] Indentation (was Re: Command generation mechanism), Richard Shann, 2013/05/06
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Indentation (was Re: Command generation mechanism), Éloi Rivard, 2013/05/06