[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] bug update-uri in uri-common
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] bug update-uri in uri-common |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Jun 2014 15:11:09 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 02:19:22PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
> So here's a new poll:
>
> a) The current behaviour of resetting port to #f if it's the default port
> for this scheme is ok.
> b) The port should not be reset, and the uri should be printed with an
> explicit port, even if it's the default for this scheme.
> c) The port should not be reset, but the uri should be printed without
> port if it's the default for this scheme.
I have now implemented c), and tagged release 1.4. Please give it a try!
Kris, thanks for reporting this problem. Thanks Andy, John and Evan
for supplying valuable feedback. Doing the right thing was tricky here.
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://www.more-magic.net