Re: [Chicken-users] bug update-uri in uri-common

[Andy Bennett]

Hi,

> So here's a new poll:
>
> a) The current behaviour of resetting port to #f if it's the default port
>      for this scheme is ok.
> b) The port should not be reset, and the uri should be printed with an
>     explicit port, even if it's the default for this scheme.
> c) The port should not be reset, but the uri should be printed without
>     port if it's the default for this scheme.
>
> Once results are in, I'll adjust the behaviour accordingly, and make a
> new uri-common release.

My vote is for (b) with the caveat that the port should not be printed if 
it is #f.


Regards,
@ndy

--
address@hidden
http://www.ashurst.eu.org/
0x7EBA75FF