[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Protocol Buffers for CHICKEN
From: |
Thomas Chust |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Protocol Buffers for CHICKEN |
Date: |
Fri, 31 May 2013 09:36:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6 |
On 2013-05-30 22:32, Felix wrote:
> [...]
> Very good - thanks a lot! I'll give this a try. Should we simply replace
> the serialization or do you think it would make sense to let the user
> choose a serialization mechanism for suspensions?
> [...]
Hello Felix,
I'm not sure the suspension egg needs a dependency on a serializer at
all. It would still serve its purpose if continuation-suspend and
continuation-resume passed around the native continuation objects and
let the client do the serialization.
And configurability is almost always a good thing :-)
Ciao,
Thomas
--
When C++ is your hammer, every problem looks like your thumb.
Re: [Chicken-users] Protocol Buffers for CHICKEN, Andy Bennett, 2013/05/29