[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Protocol Buffers for CHICKEN
From: |
Felix |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Protocol Buffers for CHICKEN |
Date: |
Wed, 29 May 2013 13:11:02 +0200 (CEST) |
From: Thomas Chust <address@hidden>
Subject: [Chicken-users] Protocol Buffers for CHICKEN
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 00:15:20 +0200
> Hello,
>
> during the CHICKEN spring thing in Cologne I started to work on a new
> egg [1] implementing the protocol buffer [2] serialization format, which
> is now in a usable and tested state.
>
> If you don't need or want to use a specific schema for your data, you
> can use the protobuf egg as a generic serialization solution that
> produces platform-independent binary representations of (almost) any
> CHICKEN values:
Whoa! Incredible! Finally a decent serialization library. Is
closure/continuation-serialization reliable? I did some simple stupid
tests and at least serializing a continuation in csi produced an error
due to a not-serializable port (which is understandable).
cheers,
felix
- [Chicken-users] Protocol Buffers for CHICKEN, Thomas Chust, 2013/05/28
- Re: [Chicken-users] Protocol Buffers for CHICKEN, Dan Leslie, 2013/05/28
- Re: [Chicken-users] Protocol Buffers for CHICKEN,
Felix <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Protocol Buffers for CHICKEN, Thomas Chust, 2013/05/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Protocol Buffers for CHICKEN, Felix, 2013/05/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Protocol Buffers for CHICKEN, Thomas Chust, 2013/05/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Protocol Buffers for CHICKEN, Felix, 2013/05/30
- Re: [Chicken-users] Protocol Buffers for CHICKEN, John Cowan, 2013/05/30
- Re: [Chicken-users] Protocol Buffers for CHICKEN, Thomas Chust, 2013/05/31
Re: [Chicken-users] Protocol Buffers for CHICKEN, Andy Bennett, 2013/05/29