Re: [Chicken-users] to "uses" or not to "uses"

[Jörg F . Wittenberger]

On Mar 25 2013, Peter Bex wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:07:15AM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
> > What's more tricky is that bindings, e.g., make-hash-table
> > resolve to unbond in the runtime initialization even though
> > there is an (import srfi-69) in the module.
> >
> > I can "fix" this by giving a (uses srfi-69) before the module.
> > But that's precisely what I feel it's wrong.
>
> import only loads the import library, it doesn't load the actual code.
> For that you need to use require-library, or you can change the
> import statement to be (require-extension srfi-69) or (use srfi-69),
> which both loads and imports.

These both don't cut it for me.

I'm using rather often (import (only module ....) (except from sonthing))

Both use and require-extension seem to import all bindings.

Also at the moment I can't really get the thing to use the statically
bound .o files reliably.  The stripped down test case picks it up.
But in the full code, it fails with ##sys#require not finding the
code.

What to do?

> Cheers,
> Peter