[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] SRFI-99 record types for CHICKEN

From: Thomas Chust
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] SRFI-99 record types for CHICKEN
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:32:14 +0200

2011/9/15 Felix <address@hidden>:
> [...]
> One question: would it be possible to optionally support SRFI-17 setters for
> record slots?
> [...]

Hello Felix,

for SRFI-99 compliance, separate setter procedures must be
generated. But the getter procedures generated by my implementation
for mutable fields already have a SRFI-17 setter attached (check lines
217 through 222 of srfi-99.scm).


When C++ is your hammer, every problem looks like your thumb.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]