[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] amb-extras: distinct? expects srfi-1 member

From: Alex Shinn
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] amb-extras: distinct? expects srfi-1 member
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:05:15 +0900

On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 1:21 AM, John Cowan <address@hidden> wrote:
> Markus Klotzbuecher scripsit:
>> distinct? from amb-extras fails with an "bad argument count" error
>> when srfi-1 is not loaded. In that case the member procedure from
>> 'scheme' and not srfi-1 is used, which doesn't take a additional
>> equality procedure as used by distinct?.
> In the R7RS small language (which is intended as a successor to R5RS),
> member will have three arguments:  see .

To clarify, the third argument is optional - i.e. the standard
`member' in R7RS is the same as in SRFI-1.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]