[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Packaging eggs
From: |
Moritz Heidkamp |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Packaging eggs |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:51:52 +0200 |
Hi,
first of all: thanks Jim for bringing this up, this will definitely help
to clean up our repository a bit :-)
Felix <address@hidden> writes:
> The version is either the tag directory or inside the setup file.
I wonder how that works when installing directly from a checkout. From
my experiments, the version returned by extension-name-and-version is
empty when I chicken-install from the trunk directory for example (which
makes sense of course, where should it know the version from). The same
is true when installing from within a tag directory though. Does
switching to the version-from-tag-directory-name scheme mean that it is
not possible to install from checkouts anymore?
Moritz
- [Chicken-users] Packaging eggs, Jim Pryor, 2010/08/30
- Re: [Chicken-users] Packaging eggs, Christian Kellermann, 2010/08/30
- Re: [Chicken-users] Packaging eggs, Jim Pryor, 2010/08/30
- Re: [Chicken-users] Packaging eggs, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2010/08/30
- Re: [Chicken-users] Packaging eggs, Jim Pryor, 2010/08/30
- Re: [Chicken-users] Packaging eggs, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2010/08/30
- Re: [Chicken-users] Packaging eggs, Felix, 2010/08/31
- Re: [Chicken-users] Packaging eggs, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2010/08/31
- Re: [Chicken-users] Packaging eggs, Felix, 2010/08/31
- Re: [Chicken-users] Packaging eggs,
Moritz Heidkamp <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Packaging eggs, Felix, 2010/08/31
- Re: [Chicken-users] Packaging eggs, Jim Pryor, 2010/08/30
Re: [Chicken-users] Packaging eggs, John Cowan, 2010/08/30