[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Automated builds
From: |
Mario Domenech Goulart |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Automated builds |
Date: |
09 Jul 2007 13:22:35 -0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.4 |
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 08:54:24 +0200 "felix winkelmann" <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 7/3/07, Arto Bendiken <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps, then, we could use a form like (platforms ...) to indicate
> > that an egg will only build on some specific platforms. One would
> > probably like to refer to some existing build/package management
> > platform for a good standard set of symbolic platform names, e.g.:
> > linux, darwin (= Mac OS X), freebsd, win32, or whatever.
>
> I have added a "(platform ...)" property to
>
> http://chicken.wiki.br/Metafile reference
>
> This is enforced nowhere, just a convention. The property should hold
> feature id's (symbols), as returned by "software-type", "build-platform", etc.
Maybe it should be used only when the egg is platform-specific, since
we have only a few eggs in this situation. If "(platform ...)" is
ommited, it means that the egg is platform-independent. Otherwise, as
far as I understand, we'd have to fill the "(platform ...)" section
with every supported platform when the egg is platform-independent.
What do you think?
Best wishes,
Mario