[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 0/1] Prevent excessive major gcs by preserving a decent amoun
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 0/1] Prevent excessive major gcs by preserving a decent amount of unused heap |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Apr 2020 19:11:06 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 10:10:13AM +1300, Evan Hanson wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I've played around with this first patch a bit, and I think I've found a
> way to apply the same technique without complicating the logic in
> C_reclaim(). Attached is a sign-off of megane's patch that introduces
> the same min-free requirement, but only at the point where reallocations
> are triggered.
Very nice cleanup, and I like the fact that it's even faster :)
> Here are the benchmarks -- review-0001 (in the middle) is the original
> patch, and review-1001 (on the right) is this version:
>
> http://paste.call-cc.org/paste?id=bdadc47d53512e46e563af1830a7bf6b276eb378
What's the deal with the FAIL for knucleotide in both patched versions?
Cheers,
Peter
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [PATCH 0/1] Prevent excessive major gcs by preserving a decent amount of unused heap,
Peter Bex <=