[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] non-termination with (declare (inline ...)
From: |
Felix |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] non-termination with (declare (inline ...)) |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Mar 2013 03:34:55 +0100 (CET) |
From: Peter Bex <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] non-termination with (declare (inline
...))
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 21:59:30 +0100
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 09:50:21PM +0100, Felix wrote:
>> > My other question remains: couldn't
>> > the inline-global with value 'yes cause a similar infinite loop?
>>
>> I don't think so. Inline-global marks a procedure as "externally"
>> inlinable, but "inline" directly controls the inline expansion.
>
> Thanks for the info! I just wanted to make sure before pushing
> a patch that might only have fixed half the problem.
Could still be the case, OTOH only half the fix is still an improvement.
>
>> Could you sign off and push this patch, please?
>
> Done!
Thanks, Peter.
cheers,
felix
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] non-termination with (declare (inline ...)), (continued)