[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] non-termination with (declare (inline ...)
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] non-termination with (declare (inline ...)) |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Mar 2013 18:41:10 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Felix scripsit:
> This leaves the decision to inline to the compiler
Excellent. However, I hope that "notinline" forces the compiler never
to inline, for the reasons I gave before. Is that now the case?
--
John Cowan <address@hidden> http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Awk!" sed Grep. "A fscking python is perloining my Ruby; let me bash
him with a Cshell! Vi didn't I mount it on a troff?" --Francis Turner