[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Re: mutex-lock! in types.db
|
From: |
Mario Domenech Goulart |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Re: mutex-lock! in types.db |
|
Date: |
Tue, 26 Feb 2013 13:49:14 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 19:40:34 +0100 Peter Bex <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 07:14:56PM +0100, Peter Bex wrote:
>> You're right, the SRFI-18 docs clearly state that an explicit #f is
>> also allowed, not just leaving off the argument.
>>
>> Attached is a patch for this, which I nominate for inclusion in the
>> stability branch. It's so trivial I didn't bother to add a NEWS
>> entry; feel free to write one up if you think it's important.
>
> Git malfunctioned (or more likely, my brain did). Here's another try.
Thanks. I've pushed your patch. I took the liberty of editing the
patch summary to s/mutex-unlock!/mutex-lock!/.
I also think this should go to stability.
Best wishes.
Mario
--
http://parenteses.org/mario