[Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Re: mutex-lock! in types.db

[Peter Bex]

On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 03:07:15PM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
> it appears that the mutex-lock! declaration in types.db is not
> currect.
> 
> The second optional argument according to my reading of may be
> either a thread (struct) or #f ; however types.db only expects
> a thread.

You're right, the SRFI-18 docs clearly state that an explicit #f is
also allowed, not just leaving off the argument.

Attached is a patch for this, which I nominate for inclusion in the
stability branch.  It's so trivial I didn't bother to add a NEWS
entry; feel free to write one up if you think it's important.

Cheers,
Peter
-- 
http://www.more-magic.net

0001-Fix-mutex-unlock-type-signature-thanks-to-Joerg-Witt.patch
Description: Text document