[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] CR: (#439) quasiquote changes
From: |
Christian Kellermann |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] CR: (#439) quasiquote changes |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 21:43:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
* John Cowan <address@hidden> [101210 21:42]:
> Thomas Chust scripsit:
>
> > to me the analogy seems quite well chosen. By the way, sometimes I
> > actually wonder whether splicing behaviour of multiple values in an
> > argument list wouldn't be a good idea, but I'm unsure.
>
> It's a Really Bad Idea, because it makes it impossible, for example, to
> report (cons (x)) as a compile-time error (too few arguments). After
> all, what if x returns two values?
I am confused by that. How cdoes this work?
Thanks,
Christian
- [Chicken-hackers] CR: (#439) quasiquote changes, Peter Bex, 2010/12/07
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CR: (#439) quasiquote changes, Peter Bex, 2010/12/08
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CR: (#439) quasiquote changes, Thomas Chust, 2010/12/10
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CR: (#439) quasiquote changes, Felix, 2010/12/10
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CR: (#439) quasiquote changes, John Cowan, 2010/12/10
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CR: (#439) quasiquote changes,
Christian Kellermann <=
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CR: (#439) quasiquote changes, Thomas Chust, 2010/12/10
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CR: (#439) quasiquote changes, John Cowan, 2010/12/10
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CR: (#439) quasiquote changes, Alaric Snell-Pym, 2010/12/11