[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] CR: (#439) quasiquote changes
From: |
Felix |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] CR: (#439) quasiquote changes |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:11:50 +0100 (CET) |
From: Thomas Chust <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] CR: (#439) quasiquote changes
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:27:51 +0100
> 2010/12/8 Peter Bex <address@hidden>:
>> [...]
>> I find this _very_ weird. It feels as if they made (+ (values 1 2 3))
>> be identical to (+ 1 2 3) - sorry if that's a weird analogy, but it's
>> exactly the same to my brain.
>
> Hello,
>
> to me the analogy seems quite well chosen. By the way, sometimes I
> actually wonder whether splicing behaviour of multiple values in an
> argument list wouldn't be a good idea, but I'm unsure.
Never.
cheers,
felix
- [Chicken-hackers] CR: (#439) quasiquote changes, Peter Bex, 2010/12/07
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CR: (#439) quasiquote changes, Peter Bex, 2010/12/08
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CR: (#439) quasiquote changes, Thomas Chust, 2010/12/10
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CR: (#439) quasiquote changes,
Felix <=
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CR: (#439) quasiquote changes, John Cowan, 2010/12/10
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CR: (#439) quasiquote changes, Christian Kellermann, 2010/12/10
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CR: (#439) quasiquote changes, Thomas Chust, 2010/12/10
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CR: (#439) quasiquote changes, John Cowan, 2010/12/10
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] CR: (#439) quasiquote changes, Alaric Snell-Pym, 2010/12/11