[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Re: Backdoor GPL in message-digest
From: |
Jim Ursetto |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Re: Backdoor GPL in message-digest |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:13:49 -0500 |
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 16:09, Jim Ursetto <address@hidden> wrote:
> In the future, perhaps you could document or discuss your reasoning
> with your user community, rather than having us find out via
> salmonella checks? We do exist, and we hang out in #chicken.
I mean email is fine too. But anyway, we would like to be kept
apprised somehow of important changes that affect the hashing eggs.
Those are pretty heavily used by some key infrastructure. And we do
appreciate the quick turnaround on check-errors, thanks.
JIm
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Re: Backdoor GPL in message-digest, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Re: Backdoor GPL in message-digest, John Cowan, 2010/08/25
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Re: Backdoor GPL in message-digest, Magnus Achim Deininger, 2010/08/25
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Re: Backdoor GPL in message-digest, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2010/08/25
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Re: Backdoor GPL in message-digest, Magnus Achim Deininger, 2010/08/26
- Message not available
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Re: Backdoor GPL in message-digest, Magnus Achim Deininger, 2010/08/26
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Re: Backdoor GPL in message-digest, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2010/08/26
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Re: Backdoor GPL in message-digest, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2010/08/26
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Re: Backdoor GPL in message-digest, Felix, 2010/08/24
- Message not available
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Re: Backdoor GPL in message-digest, Felix, 2010/08/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Re: Backdoor GPL in message-digest, Jim Ursetto, 2010/08/23
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Re: Backdoor GPL in message-digest,
Jim Ursetto <=
[Chicken-hackers] Re: Backdoor GPL in message-digest, Jim Ursetto, 2010/08/23