[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Numbers egg interaction with other compiled code.
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Numbers egg interaction with other compiled code. |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Oct 2009 05:04:26 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Alex Shinn scripsit:
> On the other hand, in 95% of cases external libraries don't
> need to treat a string as utf8 and it will work fine.
Provided they don't mutate it or use string-ref directly, I agree.
But if you try to truncate a string to five characters, and what you
get is five bytes, Bad Things.
--
John Cowan address@hidden http://ccil.org/~cowan
Female celebrity stalker, on a hot morning in Cairo:
"Imagine, Colonel Lawrence, ninety-two already!"
El Auruns's reply: "Many happy returns of the day!"
- [Chicken-hackers] Numbers egg interaction with other compiled code., Tony Sidaway, 2009/10/21
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Numbers egg interaction with other compiled code., John Cowan, 2009/10/21
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Numbers egg interaction with other compiled code., Tony Sidaway, 2009/10/21
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Numbers egg interaction with other compiled code., John Cowan, 2009/10/21
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Numbers egg interaction with other compiled code., Tony Sidaway, 2009/10/23
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Numbers egg interaction with other compiled code., Alex Shinn, 2009/10/23
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Numbers egg interaction with other compiled code.,
John Cowan <=
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Numbers egg interaction with other compiled code., Tony Sidaway, 2009/10/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Numbers egg interaction with other compiled code., John Cowan, 2009/10/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Numbers egg interaction with other compiled code., Tony Sidaway, 2009/10/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Numbers egg interaction with other compiled code., Tony Sidaway, 2009/10/24
[Chicken-hackers] Re: Numbers egg interaction with other compiled code., Tony Sidaway, 2009/10/21