[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] serious bug ? in units and set!
From: |
Jim Ursetto |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] serious bug ? in units and set! |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:35:50 -0500 |
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Thomas Chust <address@hidden> wrote:
> second this still doesn't explain why the (format
> ...) expression is evaluated at compile time instead of at runtime.
Sorry. I read your last message too fast. That is definitely a bug
and it only happens when the set! is present and the set! refers to
foo.
- [Chicken-hackers] serious bug ? in units and set!, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2009/09/21
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] serious bug ? in units and set!, Jim Ursetto, 2009/09/22
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] serious bug ? in units and set!, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2009/09/22
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] serious bug ? in units and set!, Thomas Chust, 2009/09/22
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] serious bug ? in units and set!, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2009/09/22
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] serious bug ? in units and set!, Thomas Chust, 2009/09/22
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] serious bug ? in units and set!, Jim Ursetto, 2009/09/22
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] serious bug ? in units and set!, Thomas Chust, 2009/09/22
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] serious bug ? in units and set!,
Jim Ursetto <=