chicken-hackers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Build problems


From: Brandon J. Van Every
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] Build problems
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 10:45:31 -0800
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207)

felix winkelmann wrote:
On 1/29/07, John Cowan <address@hidden> wrote:
felix winkelmann scripsit:

> (Why isn't /usr/local/lib in the default linker path? And why do some
> systems not put /usr/local/bin into the PATH? Why make using the system
> harder than it needs to be? Oh, well...)

Some distros reject the whole idea of /usr/local, basically.
They make no distinction between system packages in /bin or /usr/bin
and local packages in /usr/local/bin (and their lib analogues): it's
all just packages.

Ok, but since all autotools-based source packages automatically
use /usr/local as prefix, distros should at least prepare for that situation
and not let the user stand there scratching his/her head.

Sounds like Autotools takes care of the /usr/local problem that it creates, via libtool. CMake doesn't. So it looks like we'll need INSTALL_RPATH.


Cheers,
Brandon Van Every





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]