[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] let the Windows binary go bye-bye
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] let the Windows binary go bye-bye |
Date: |
Mon, 6 Nov 2006 12:38:02 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
Brandon J. Van Every scripsit:
> >>Well, barring the interpreter, perhaps.
There are better interpreters.
> Well let's try a straw poll: who would miss it if it went bye-bye? I
> wouldn't.
This isn't the place to poll, and chicken-users is only somewhat
better.
--
John Cowan http://ccil.org/~cowan address@hidden
[T]here is a Darwinian explanation for the refusal to accept Darwin.
Given the very pessimistic conclusions about moral purpose to which his
theory drives us, and given the importance of a sense of moral purpose
in helping us cope with life, a refusal to believe Darwin's theory may
have important survival value. --Ian Johnston
- [Chicken-hackers] Windows binary limited to C:\Program Files, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/11/05
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] Windows binary limited to C:\Program Files, felix winkelmann, 2006/11/06
- [Chicken-hackers] let the Windows binary go bye-bye, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/11/06
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] let the Windows binary go bye-bye,
John Cowan <=
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] let the Windows binary go bye-bye, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/11/06
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] let the Windows binary go bye-bye, John Cowan, 2006/11/06
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] let the Windows binary go bye-bye, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/11/07
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] let the Windows binary go bye-bye, John Cowan, 2006/11/07
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] let the Windows binary go bye-bye, Brandon J. Van Every, 2006/11/08
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] let the Windows binary go bye-bye, felix winkelmann, 2006/11/07
Re: [Chicken-hackers] Windows binary limited to C:\Program Files, felix winkelmann, 2006/11/07