[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [certi-dev] Solaris8/GCC-3.4.2; Was: Solaris10/SunStudio

From: Eric Noulard
Subject: Re: [certi-dev] Solaris8/GCC-3.4.2; Was: Solaris10/SunStudio
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 20:59:10 +0200

2009/5/27 Martin Spott <address@hidden>:
> Eric Noulard wrote:
>> To be continued on the bug tracker:
>> https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?26681
> After applying 'bug-26681-gcc3.4.patch':
> [  1%] Building CXX object libHLA/CMakeFiles/HLA.dir/HLAbuffer.o
> /usr/local/bin/c++   -DHLA_EXPORTS   -fmessage-length=0 -pedantic -ansi -Wall 
> -Woverloaded-virtual -Wno-unused-function -Wno-long-long -g -fPIC 
> -I/usr/local/include/libxml2 -I/usr/local/src/certi/include 
> -I/usr/local/src/certi -I/usr/local/src/certi/libHLA   -DHOST_IS_BIG_ENDIAN 
> libHLA/CMakeFiles/HLA.dir/HLAbuffer.o -c 
> /usr/local/src/certi/libHLA/HLAbuffer.cc
> In file included from /usr/local/src/certi/libHLA/HLAbuffer.cc:17:
> /usr/local/src/certi/libHLA/HLAbuffer.hh:41:9: #error "Cannot find suitable 
> 64 bits types???"

Such a shame.

Is it really impossible to find a 64 bits long integer type on 32bits
machine using gcc 3.4.x ??

I'll have a look but this is weird.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]