bug-xorriso
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [report] [bug] libisofs cant omit "; 1" with "omit_version_off" set,


From: Thomas Schmitt
Subject: Re: [report] [bug] libisofs cant omit "; 1" with "omit_version_off" set, and windows marked "; 1" as "_1" with file name.
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:46:15 +0100

Hi,

mfreesky@qq.com wrote:
> I can understand the iso9660 burnning process more different with
> MS Windows.

Not necessarily.
I need more info from you in order to tell more:

- The exact xorriso arguments you used in step 1 and 3.

- The kind of medium that is used (DVD+R, DVD-R, DVD+RW, DVD-RW ...).
  I.e. the message output from

    xorriso -indev /dev/sr0 -toc

  (Please as text, not as screenshot.)

- The ISO image file of the medium. I.e. the file resulting from

    xorriso -indev /dev/sr0 -check_media data_to="$HOME"/image_file.iso --
    gzip "$HOME"/image_file.iso

  Send the resulting file
    "$HOME"/image_file.iso.gz
  to
    scdbackup@gmx.net


> and understand the Joliet was specified and endorsed by Microsoft, may not
> well supported on Linux.

It is supported because Microsoft was so nice to publish the specification.
ISO 9660 production programs like mkisofs or xorriso produce it and the
Linux kernel uses it by default as second choice if no Rock Ridge is
present. You can force the Linux kernel to use Joliet by mount option
  -o norock
You can force xorriso to use Joliet by command
  -read_fs norock
I assume it did that by default when reading the medium for step 3,
because the MS file manager probably did not write Rock Ridge information.

The problem is obviously in the way how the two involved burn programs
xorriso and the MS file manager perceive the names and write them when
creating the directory tree of the next session.
Since i have no Microsoft operating system, my best chance to find out
more is the ISO image from the medium with the three sessions.


> But if not used Joliet on Xorriso,  some special words are invisible.

Yes. Without Joliet, MS-Windows sees only the dull ISO 9660 names.
You want Joliet if you want to use the medium with MS-Windows.


> So, if possible, can find a way to support  Linux and Windows burining
> files?

We need to find out, what step 2 did. Thus my wish for the ISO image file.


Have a nice day :)

Thomas




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]