[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug-inetutils] Re: route
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
[bug-inetutils] Re: route |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:05:17 -0400 |
> And we cannot use libnl, it is licensed under the LGPL version
> 2.1 only, we use GPL version 3 or later in inetutils.
We can if we use LGPLv3+ for libroute.
That is not something I can decide, it is up to the FSF. But my quick
reading is that LGPLv2-static-library + LGPLv3+-static-library +
GPLv3+-program is a no go (the whole program must be licensed under
the terms of the GPL, and one cannot relicense the LGPLv2 part under
terms compatible with GPLv3+), and seeing that we might add cool
features, it would be a bad idea to allow software hoarders to use the
library.
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, (continued)
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/16
Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/05
[bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/26
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/26
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/26
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/26
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/09/27
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/28
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/28
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/28
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/28
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/28
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/28
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/28
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/28
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/28