[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-inetutils] route
From: |
Debarshi Ray |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-inetutils] route |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Sep 2008 18:22:21 +0530 |
> Checking for the operating system is always the wrong way to do it,
> any such patch will be automatically rejected.
Inetutils' ifconfig does something similar, and since it was not
rejected, I don't agree with you.
Happy hacking,
Debarshi
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, (continued)
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/05
- Re: [bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/16
Re: [bug-inetutils] route,
Debarshi Ray <=
[bug-inetutils] route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/26
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/26
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/26
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/26
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/26
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/09/27
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/28
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/28
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/09/28
- [bug-inetutils] Re: route, Debarshi Ray, 2008/09/28