[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: rumpdisk status

From: Samuel Thibault
Subject: Re: rumpdisk status
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 20:12:11 +0100
User-agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3)

Samuel Thibault, le lun. 09 nov. 2020 20:06:28 +0100, a ecrit:
> I'd say track the offset within the pread calls, to make sure that it is
> not getting lost along the path.

Also, I'd say put prints around the pread and pwrite calls. Actually now
realizing that rumpdisk is for now single-threaded, they shouldn't even
be getting intermixed at all.

Btw, is your second partition within small bounds? (e.g. within 4GiB
that can be expressed with 32bit integers)


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]